
FirePro S7150 vs GRID M60-1Q

FirePro S7150
Popular choices:

GRID M60-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S7150 is positioned at rank 315 and the GRID M60-1Q is on rank 322, so the FirePro S7150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S7150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-1Q.
| Insight | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M60-1Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-1Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $459), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 799.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+799.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and GRID M60-1Q

FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

GRID M60-1Q
The GRID M60-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,695 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GRID M60-1Q reaches 3,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID M60-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1Q). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1Q).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770+2% | 3,695 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.768 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-1Q has 2 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-1Q) — the GRID M60-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GRID M60-1Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GRID M60-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+53% | 16.4 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP and currently averages $459, while the GRID M60-1Q launched at $2500 and now averages $50. The GRID M60-1Q costs 89.1% less ($409 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (FirePro S7150) vs 73.9 (GRID M60-1Q) — the GRID M60-1Q offers 801.2% better value. The FirePro S7150 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399-4% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $459 | $50-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 73.9+801% |
| Codename | Tonga | GM204 |
| Release | February 1 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #521 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












