Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S7150 vs GRID M60-4Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID M60-4Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S7150 vs GRID M60-4Q Performance Spectrum

FirePro S7150
4 GB 150
3,770
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon RX 560X
brand logoRadeon R9 290 / 390
brand logoRadeon RX 5700M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GRID M60-4Q
2 GB 225
3,831
+1.6%
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 470M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs GRID M60-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M60-4Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    4.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$2,399 MSRP
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
  • ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M60-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (3,831 vs 3,770), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.6% (1.6 vs 1.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M60-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro S7150 vs GRID M60-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-4Q

The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GRID M60-4Q reaches 3,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID M60-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-4Q).

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
G3D Mark Score
3,770
3,831+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-4Q carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-4Q) — the GRID M60-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (GRID M60-4Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GRID M60-4Q). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID M60-4Q).

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
UVD 5.0
NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GRID M60-4Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GRID M60-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
267mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
25.1+48%
17.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the GRID M60-4Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro S7150 was 4% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 1.5 (GRID M60-4Q) — the FirePro S7150 offers 6.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro S7150 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
MSRP
$2399-4%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
1.6+7%
1.5
Codename
Tonga
GM204
Release
February 1 2016
August 30 2015
Ranking
#521
#433
Search FirePro S7150 on AmazonSearch GRID M60-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.