FirePro S7150
VS
GRID M60-4Q

FirePro S7150 vs GRID M60-4Q

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
VS

GRID M60-4Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S7150 is positioned at rank 315 and the GRID M60-4Q is on rank 318, so the FirePro S7150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
100%
#299
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9410%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
100%
#316
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
98%
#317
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
97%
#318
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
97%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
97%
#320
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
96%
#321
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
94%
#322
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
90%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
90%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
89%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
88%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
87%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
87%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
85%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-4Q

#303
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9656%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
99%
#320
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
99%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
99%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
97%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
93%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
91%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
90%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
87%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
85%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
84%
#333
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M60-4Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-4Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $459), it costs 74% less, resulting in a 288.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+288.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459)
More affordable ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and GRID M60-4Q

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-4Q

The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GRID M60-4Q reaches 3,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID M60-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-4Q).

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
G3D Mark Score
3,770
3,831+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-4Q has 2 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-4Q) — the GRID M60-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (GRID M60-4Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GRID M60-4Q). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID M60-4Q).

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
UVD 5.0
NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GRID M60-4Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GRID M60-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
25.1+48%
17.0
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP and currently averages $459, while the GRID M60-4Q launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The GRID M60-4Q costs 73.9% less ($339 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (FirePro S7150) vs 31.9 (GRID M60-4Q) — the GRID M60-4Q offers 289% better value. The FirePro S7150 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro S7150GRID M60-4Q
MSRP
$2399-4%
$2500
Avg Price (30d)
$459
$120-74%
Performance per Dollar
8.2
31.9+289%
Codename
Tonga
GM204
Release
February 1 2016
August 30 2015
Ranking
#521
#433