GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

99%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

86%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

83%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

83%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

81%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

81%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

78%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

76%

#59

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

679%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

100%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

92%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

79%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 112.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+112.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-112.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $48), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 36.2% better value per dollar than the Quadro P620.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+36.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro P620 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro P620

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P620's 3,698 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 112.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score	7,869+113%	3,698
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+75%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+102%	1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+15%	1443 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
DirectX	12	12 (FL12_1)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P620
TDP	75W	40W-47%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	145mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+13%	92.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170 and now averages $48. The Quadro P620 costs 36% less ($27 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 77.0 (Quadro P620) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 36.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).