A6-7000 vs Celeron T3300
A6-7000
Celeron T3300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7000 is positioned at rank 1081 and the Celeron T3300 is on rank 1038, so the Celeron T3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-7000
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-7000 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-7000 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-7000 and Celeron T3300
A6-7000
The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron T3300
The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A6-7000 is built on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Celeron T3300's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T3300.
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB | — |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | — |
| PassMark | 1,002 | 1,005 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron T3300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A6-7000) / not specified (Celeron T3300). The A6-7000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Celeron T3300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U.
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R4 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The A6-7000 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron T3300 debuted at $86. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Celeron T3300 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7000 delivers 66.8 pts/$ vs 67.0 pts/$ for the Celeron T3300 — making the Celeron T3300 the 0.3% better value option.
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $86-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.8 | 67.0 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-7000 and Celeron T3300
