A6-7000 vs Core 2 Duo E4300

A6-7000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014

Core 2 Duo E4300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

A6-7000

2 / 2

1,002

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo E4300

2 / 2

1,005

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7000 is positioned at rank 1081 and the Core 2 Duo E4300 is on rank 1015, so the Core 2 Duo E4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7000

#1069

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2928%

#1070

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2885%

#1071

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2649%

#1072

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2637%

#1073

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2613%

#1075

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2523%

#1076

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2419%

#1077

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2415%

#1078

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2350%

#1081

A6-7000

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

100%

#1083

Core i5-2520M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#1084

Core i7-2710QE

MSRP: $378|Avg: $40

99%

#1089

Core i5-3610ME

MSRP: $276|Avg: $22

96%

#1090

Core m3-7Y32

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1092

Celeron B720

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

95%

#1093

Celeron 847

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

95%

#1094

Core i7-2630QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

94%

#1096

Core i7-2635QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4300

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

35064%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

33132%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

24056%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

7247%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

5740%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

5022%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

2876%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

2839%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

2585%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

2584%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

2556%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

2487%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

2452%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

2442%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

2420%

#1015

Core 2 Duo E4300

MSRP: $113|Avg: $5

100%

#1017

Core 2 Duo E4500

MSRP: $133|Avg: $10

99%

#1019

Core 2 Duo E7600

MSRP: $133|Avg: $50

97%

#1020

Core i7-3970X

MSRP: $990|Avg: $60

97%

#1021

Core 2 Duo E8700

MSRP: $256|Avg: $30

97%

#1022

Core 2 Duo E6550

MSRP: $163|Avg: $20

96%

#1023

Phenom X3 8450

MSRP: $145|Avg: $147

95%

#1024

Core i7-3960X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $60

95%

#1025

Celeron 2.70

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

94%

#1027

A10 PRO-7850B

MSRP: $426|Avg: $140

91%

#1028

Core 2 Quad Q8200

MSRP: $224|Avg: $36

91%

#1029

A12-9800E

MSRP: $426|Avg: $150

90%

#1030

Phenom II X6 1065T

MSRP: $426|Avg: $170

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-7000 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	A6-7000	Core 2 Duo E4300
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($5)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E4300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	A6-7000	Core 2 Duo E4300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+201%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

A6-7000 Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo E4300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-7000 and Core 2 Duo E4300

A6-7000

The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo E4300

The Core 2 Duo E4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7000 and Core 2 Duo E4300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-7000 versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4300 — a 50% clock advantage for the A6-7000 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-7000 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Core 2 Duo E4300's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4300.

Feature	A6-7000	Core 2 Duo E4300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	1,002	1,005

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7000 versus 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4300 — the A6-7000 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7000) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E4300). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A6-7000) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4300).

Feature	A6-7000	Core 2 Duo E4300
Socket	FT3	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600+100%	800
Max RAM Capacity	16	16
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7000) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4300). The A6-7000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U; Core 2 Duo E4300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

Feature	A6-7000	Core 2 Duo E4300
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R4 Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	false

💰

Value Analysis

The A6-7000 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E4300 debuted at $113. At current prices ($15 vs $5), the Core 2 Duo E4300 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7000 delivers 66.8 pts/$ vs 201.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E4300 — making the Core 2 Duo E4300 the 100.2% better value option.