Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

A6-7000 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

A6-7000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Athlon X2 BE-2350

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

A6-7000 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350 Performance Spectrum

A6-7000
2 / 2
1,002
+2.8%
brand logoAthlon 64 3400+
brand logoAthlon 64 3800+
brand logoAthlon 64 FX-57
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 TK-42
brand logoRyzen 5 5600GT
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Athlon X2 BE-2350
2 / 2
975
0.0%
brand logoAthlon 64 3400+
brand logoAthlon 64 3800+
brand logoAthlon 64 FX-57
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 TK-42
brand logoRyzen 5 8640U
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7000 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
A6-7000
low25 FPS
medium25 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Athlon X2 BE-2350
low24 FPS
medium24 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

A6-7000 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7000

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
  • ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4 Graphics, while Athlon X2 BE-2350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $90 MSRP).

Athlon X2 BE-2350

2007

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($90 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 8.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($90 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (975 vs 1,002).
  • ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7000 better than Athlon X2 BE-2350?
Yes. A6-7000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A6-7000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A6-7000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7000 comes in 11.1% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $90 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X2 BE-2350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 8.1% better value on paper (10.8 vs 10.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-7000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7000 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6-7000

The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Athlon X2 BE-2350

The Athlon X2 BE-2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 975 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7000 and Athlon X2 BE-2350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-7000 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A6-7000. The A6-7000 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Athlon X2 BE-2350's 975 — a 2.7% lead for the A6-7000.

FeatureA6-7000Athlon X2 BE-2350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
—
L3 Cache
—
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,002+3%
975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7000 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — the A6-7000 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7000) vs 2 (Athlon X2 BE-2350). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7000) vs 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2350) — the A6-7000 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A6-7000) and AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2350).

FeatureA6-7000Athlon X2 BE-2350
Socket
FT3
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600+100%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-7000) / not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2350). The A6-7000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U.

FeatureA6-7000Athlon X2 BE-2350
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R4 Graphics
—
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
No
—
Virtualization
true
—
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-7000 was priced at $100, while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 came in at $90. On launch pricing ($100 vs $90), Athlon X2 BE-2350 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7000 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — making the Athlon X2 BE-2350 the 7.8% better value option.

FeatureA6-7000Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP
$100
$90-10%
Performance per Dollar
10.0
10.8+8%
Release Date
2014
2007
Search A6-7000 on AmazonSearch Athlon X2 BE-2350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.