A6-7000 vs Celeron 1019Y
A6-7000
Celeron 1019Y
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7000 is positioned at rank 1081 and the Celeron 1019Y is on rank 441, so the Celeron 1019Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-7000
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1019Y
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-7000 | Celeron 1019Y |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-7000 | Celeron 1019Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-7000 and Celeron 1019Y
A6-7000
The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron 1019Y
The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.
Processing Power
Both the A6-7000 and Celeron 1019Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-7000 versus 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y — a 100% clock advantage for the A6-7000 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A6-7000 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 1019Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Celeron 1019Y's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 1019Y.
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron 1019Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+200% | 1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+120% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,002 | 1,005 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 1019Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7000 versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y — the A6-7000 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7000) vs 2 (Celeron 1019Y). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A6-7000) and HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y).
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron 1019Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 32 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7000) vs VT-x (Celeron 1019Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7000) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1019Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U; Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.
| Feature | A6-7000 | Celeron 1019Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R4 Graphics | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-7000 and Celeron 1019Y
