A6-7000 vs Celeron 1019Y

A6-7000 vs Celeron 1019Y Performance Spectrum

A6-7000

2 / 2

1,002

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1019Y

2 / 2

1,005

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7000 vs Celeron 1019Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7000 vs Celeron 1019Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7000

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,002 vs 1,005).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron 1019Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron 1019Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7000 better than Celeron 1019Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7000 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7000 is the better buy right now. A6-7000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 1019Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7000 vs Celeron 1019Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7000

The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7000 and Celeron 1019Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-7000 versus 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y — a 100% clock advantage for the A6-7000 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A6-7000 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 1019Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Celeron 1019Y's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 1019Y.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron 1019Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+200%	1 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+120%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,002	1,005

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 1019Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7000) vs 2 (Celeron 1019Y). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A6-7000) and HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y).

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron 1019Y
Socket	FT3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7000) vs VT-x (Celeron 1019Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7000) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1019Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U; Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.