Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Celeron T3100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).

Celeron T3100

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 11.2 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (945 vs 965).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron P4600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron P4600 better than Celeron T3100?

Yes. Celeron P4600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron P4600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron P4600 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron P4600 comes in 38.7% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron T3100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 35.8% better value on paper (15.2 vs 11.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron P4600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron T3100

The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron P4600 is built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron P4600 scores 965 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 2.1% lead for the Celeron P4600. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4600 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	2 GHz+5%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Westmere (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	965+2%	945
Geekbench 6 Single	—	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron P4600 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron T3100 — the Celeron P4600 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron P4600) vs 0 (Celeron T3100) — the Celeron P4600 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4600) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron T3100).

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3100
Socket	PGA988	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron P4600) vs None (Celeron T3100). The Celeron P4600 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Celeron T3100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3100
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	None
Target Use	—	Legacy Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron P4600 was priced at $86, while the Celeron T3100 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($86 vs $62), Celeron T3100 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4600 delivers 11.2 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3100 — making the Celeron T3100 the 30.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3100
MSRP	$86	$62-28%
Performance per Dollar	11.2	15.2+36%
Release Date	2010	2008

Search Celeron P4600 on Amazon

Search Celeron T3100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.