Celeron T3000 vs Pentium T3400

Intel

Celeron T3000

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium T3400

35 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron T3000 vs Pentium T3400 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T3000 vs Pentium T3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T3000 vs Pentium T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T3000

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T3400

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T3000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (845 vs 905).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron T3000 better than Pentium T3400?
    Yes. Celeron T3000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron T3000 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3000 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $150 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 7.1% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron T3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron T3000 vs Pentium T3400 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron T3000

    The Celeron T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium T3400

    The Pentium T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 845 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    In PassMark, the Celeron T3000 scores 905 against the Pentium T3400's 845 — a 6.9% lead for the Celeron T3000. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron T3000Pentium T3400
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2.16 GHz+20%
    L3 Cache
    1 MB L2 Cache
    1 MB L2 Cache
    Process
    45 nm-31%
    65 nm
    PassMark
    905+7%
    845
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0.

    FeatureCeleron T3000Pentium T3400
    Socket
    PGA478
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron T3000 was priced at $150, while the Pentium T3400 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($150 vs $150), Pentium T3400 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3000 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Pentium T3400 — making the Celeron T3000 the 6.9% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron T3000Pentium T3400
    MSRP
    $150
    $150
    Performance per Dollar
    6.0+7%
    5.6
    Release Date
    2009
    2008

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.