
Celeron U3400 vs Celeron SU2300

Celeron U3400

Celeron SU2300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron U3400 is positioned at rank 1172 and the Celeron SU2300 is on rank 1223, so the Celeron U3400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron U3400
Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron U3400 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron U3400 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2728%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron U3400 and Celeron SU2300

Celeron U3400
The Celeron U3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron SU2300
The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron U3400 is built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron U3400 scores 575 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 5.4% lead for the Celeron U3400. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron U3400 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.06 GHz | 1.2 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere (2010−2011) | — |
| PassMark | 575+6% | 545 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron U3400 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Celeron U3400 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Celeron SU2300 debuted at $134. At current prices ($5 vs $134), the Celeron U3400 is $129 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron U3400 delivers 115.0 pts/$ vs 4.1 pts/$ for the Celeron SU2300 — making the Celeron U3400 the 186.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-36% | $134 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-96% | $134 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.0+2705% | 4.1 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















