
Celeron U3400 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

Celeron U3400

Ryzen 9 5900X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron U3400 is positioned at rank #1172 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron U3400
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron U3400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron U3400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 9 5900X

Celeron U3400
The Celeron U3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Celeron U3400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Celeron U3400 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 194.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.06 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron U3400 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron U3400 scores 575 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 194.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron U3400 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 4.8 GHz+6757% |
| Base Clock | 1.06 GHz | 3.7 GHz+249% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Westmere (2010−2011) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 575 | 38,955+6675% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron U3400 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron U3400) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Celeron U3400 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. At current prices ($5 vs $350), the Celeron U3400 is $345 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron U3400 delivers 115.0 pts/$ vs 111.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Celeron U3400 the 3.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-84% | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-99% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.0+3% | 111.3 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















