CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo E4300
A6-7000
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4300 is positioned at rank 1015 and the A6-7000 is on rank 1081, so the Core 2 Duo E4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4300
Performance Per Dollar A6-7000
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4300 | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4300 | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+201%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4300 and A6-7000
Core 2 Duo E4300
The Core 2 Duo E4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $249.
A6-7000
The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E4300 and A6-7000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4300 versus 3 GHz on the A6-7000 — a 50% clock advantage for the A6-7000 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4300 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the A6-7000 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4300 scores 1,005 against the A6-7000's 1,002 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4300.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4300 | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1024 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,005 | 1,002 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E4300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-7000 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4300 versus 1600 on the A6-7000 — the A6-7000 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E4300) vs 1 (A6-7000). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4300) and FP3 (A6-7000).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4300 | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | 800 | 1600+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Core 2 Duo E4300) vs true (A6-7000). The A6-7000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+; A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4300 | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon R4 Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | true |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E4300 launched at $113 MSRP, while the A6-7000 debuted at $100. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo E4300 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4300 delivers 201.0 pts/$ vs 66.8 pts/$ for the A6-7000 — making the Core 2 Duo E4300 the 100.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4300 | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $113 | $100-12% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-67% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 201.0+201% | 66.8 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E4300 and A6-7000
