Core 2 Duo E4300
VS
Core i3-3229Y

Core 2 Duo E4300 vs Core i3-3229Y

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core i3-3229Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4300 is positioned at rank 1015 and the Core i3-3229Y is on rank 437, so the Core i3-3229Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
35064%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33132%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24056%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7247%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5740%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5022%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2876%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2839%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2585%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2556%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2487%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2452%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2442%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2420%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
100%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
99%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
97%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
97%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
97%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
95%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
95%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
91%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
91%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
90%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3229Y

#425
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
579%
#426
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
570%
#427
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
523%
#428
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
521%
#429
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
516%
#431
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
499%
#432
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
478%
#433
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
477%
#434
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
464%
#437
Core i3-3229Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-3229Y (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo E4300Core i3-3229Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E4300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo E4300Core i3-3229Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4300 and Core i3-3229Y

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4300

The Core 2 Duo E4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E4300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3229Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4300 versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y — a 25% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4300 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4300 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-3229Y uses Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4300 scores 1,005 against the Core i3-3229Y's 1,014 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-3229Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4300Core i3-3229Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+29%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz+29%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Allendale (2006−2009)
Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
PassMark
1,005
1,014
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E4300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-3229Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4300 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-3229Y — the Core 2 Duo E4300 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3229Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4300) and HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y).

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4300Core i3-3229Y
Socket
LGA775
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
800+26567%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
32 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Core 2 Duo E4300) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y). The Core i3-3229Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+; Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4300Core i3-3229Y
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget