Core 2 Duo E4500
VS
Xeon W3505

Core 2 Duo E4500 vs Xeon W3505

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Xeon W3505

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 0.53 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4500 is positioned at rank 1017 and the Xeon W3505 is on rank 970, so the Xeon W3505 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
35584%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33623%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24413%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7355%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5826%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5096%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2919%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2881%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2623%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2623%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2593%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2524%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2488%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2478%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2456%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
100%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
99%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
99%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
99%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
98%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
96%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
96%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
92%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
92%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
92%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
91%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
91%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3505

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
35708%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6742%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5990%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4627%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
98%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
97%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
100%
#970
Xeon W3505
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#971
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
99%
#972
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
99%
#973
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
99%
#975
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
97%
#978
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
95%
#979
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
94%
#980
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
93%
#981
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
91%
#982
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
91%
#984
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3505 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore 2 Duo E4500Xeon W3505
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E4500 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore 2 Duo E4500Xeon W3505
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4500 and Xeon W3505

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4500

The Core 2 Duo E4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,165 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E4500 and Xeon W3505 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4500 versus 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 — a 122.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4500 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4500 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon W3505 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4500 scores 1,165 against the Xeon W3505's 1,163 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4500 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3505.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4500Xeon W3505
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+315%
0.53 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.53 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Allendale (2006−2009)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,165
1,163
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E4500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon W3505 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4500Xeon W3505
Socket
LGA775
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Core 2 Duo E4500) / not specified (Xeon W3505). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4500 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4600+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4500Xeon W3505
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false