Core 2 Duo E4600 vs Atom x5-Z8500
Core 2 Duo E4600
Atom x5-Z8500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4600 is positioned at rank 1006 and the Atom x5-Z8500 is on rank 450, so the Atom x5-Z8500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4600
Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Atom x5-Z8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9.6) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Atom x5-Z8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9.6) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4600 and Atom x5-Z8500
Core 2 Duo E4600
The Core 2 Duo E4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.
Atom x5-Z8500
The Atom x5-Z8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,242 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E4600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4600 versus 2.24 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8500 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4600 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.44 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4600 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8500 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4600 scores 1,235 against the Atom x5-Z8500's 1,242 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x5-Z8500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Atom x5-Z8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+7% | 2.24 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+67% | 1.44 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,235 | 1,242 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E4600 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom x5-Z8500 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E4600 versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x5-Z8500 — the Atom x5-Z8500 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E4600 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo E4600) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8500) — the Atom x5-Z8500 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Q963,P35,G31 (Core 2 Duo E4600) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8500).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Atom x5-Z8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | LPDDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 2 |
Advanced Features
The Atom x5-Z8500 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Atom x5-Z8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E4600 and Atom x5-Z8500
