Core 2 Duo E4600 vs Celeron G470
Core 2 Duo E4600
Celeron G470
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4600 is positioned at rank 1006 and the Celeron G470 is on rank 542, so the Celeron G470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4600
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G470
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Celeron G470 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($9.6) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Celeron G470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+5%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($9.6) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4600 and Celeron G470
Core 2 Duo E4600
The Core 2 Duo E4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.
Celeron G470
The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E4600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G470 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo E4600 has 1 more core. The Core 2 Duo E4600 is built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4600 scores 1,235 against the Celeron G470's 1,225 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4600 vs 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Celeron G470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | — |
| PassMark | 1,235 | 1,225 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 300 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E4600 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G470 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E4600 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 — the Celeron G470 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo E4600) vs 16 (Celeron G470) — the Celeron G470 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Q963,P35,G31 (Core 2 Duo E4600) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Celeron G470 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1066+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E4600) / VT-x (Celeron G470). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Celeron G470 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E4600 launched at $133 MSRP, while the Celeron G470 debuted at $35. At current prices ($9.6 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo E4600 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4600 delivers 128.6 pts/$ vs 122.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G470 — making the Core 2 Duo E4600 the 4.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Celeron G470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $133 | $35-74% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9.6-4% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 128.6+5% | 122.5 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E4600 and Celeron G470
