Core 2 Duo E6300
VS
A6-1450

Core 2 Duo E6300 vs A6-1450

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2006
VS
AMD

A6-1450

4 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6300 is positioned at rank 1058 and the A6-1450 is on rank 929, so the A6-1450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
48179%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
45524%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
33054%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9958%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6900%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3952%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3900%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3417%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3355%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3325%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
100%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
99%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
98%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
98%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
94%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
91%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
91%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
89%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
88%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
87%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
87%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
83%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
77%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-1450

#917
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1658%
#918
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1633%
#919
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1499%
#920
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1493%
#921
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1479%
#923
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1428%
#924
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1369%
#925
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1367%
#926
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1331%
#929
A6-1450
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-1450 (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo E6300A6-1450
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo E6300A6-1450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6300 and A6-1450

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

The Core 2 Duo E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A6-1450

The A6-1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E6300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-1450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-1450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6300 versus 1.4 GHz on the A6-1450 — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6300 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6300 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the A6-1450 uses Temash (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6300 scores 1,055 against the A6-1450's 1,062 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-1450. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300A6-1450
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.87 GHz+34%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz+86%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Conroe (2006−2007)
Temash (2013)
PassMark
1,055
1,062
Geekbench 6 Single
144
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E6300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-1450 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6300 versus DDR3L-1066 on the A6-1450 — the Core 2 Duo E6300 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6300 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E6300) vs 1 (A6-1450). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6300) vs 8 (A6-1450) — the Core 2 Duo E6300 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6300) and SoC (A6-1450).

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300A6-1450
Socket
LGA775
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16
8 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6300) vs AMD-V (A6-1450). The A6-1450 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8250), while the Core 2 Duo E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-1450 targets Low Power Tablet/Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+; A6-1450 rivals Atom Z3740.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300A6-1450
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon HD 8250
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Low Power Tablet/Laptop