Core 2 Duo E6400 vs Celeron N2830

CPU

GPU

Core 2 Duo E6400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2006

Celeron N2830

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.41 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core 2 Duo E6400

2 / 2

1,175

0.0%

1,185

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6400 is positioned at rank 1059 and the Celeron N2830 is on rank 82, so the Celeron N2830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6400

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

48554%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

45879%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

33312%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

10035%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

7949%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

6954%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

3983%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

3931%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

3579%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

3579%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

3539%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

3443%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

3395%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

3381%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

3351%

#1059

Core 2 Duo E6400

MSRP: $183|Avg: $10

100%

#1060

Core 2 Duo E8300

MSRP: $163|Avg: $20

99%

#1061

Phenom X4 9500

MSRP: $247|Avg: $30

99%

#1062

Celeron D 352

MSRP: $69|Avg: $15

94%

#1063

Core i7-970

MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289

94%

#1064

Core i7-880

MSRP: $583|Avg: $40

92%

#1065

Pentium D 820

MSRP: $241|Avg: $20

91%

#1066

Celeron 2.10

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

91%

#1067

Core i7-950

MSRP: $562|Avg: $15

90%

#1068

Sempron 3100+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $15

89%

#1069

Core 2 Duo E6750

MSRP: $183|Avg: $15

88%

#1070

Athlon II X4 635

MSRP: $400|Avg: $250

88%

#1071

Core i7-940

MSRP: $562|Avg: $90

84%

#1072

Celeron 2.40

MSRP: $69|Avg: $13

78%

#1073

Sempron 2800+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $29

77%

#1074

Athlon 64 3100+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

74%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2830

#27

Core Ultra 7 265HX

MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A

92%

#70

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

248%

#71

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

244%

#72

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

224%

#73

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

223%

#74

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

221%

#76

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

213%

#77

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

205%

#78

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

204%

#79

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

199%

#82

Celeron N2830

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#88

Core 2 Duo T7500

MSRP: $316|Avg: $5

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N2830 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E6400	Celeron N2830
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6400 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E6400	Celeron N2830
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 2 Duo E6400 Benchmark Check

Celeron N2830 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6400 and Celeron N2830

Core 2 Duo E6400

The Core 2 Duo E6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $249.

Celeron N2830

The Celeron N2830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E6400 and Celeron N2830 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6400 versus 2.41 GHz on the Celeron N2830 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Celeron N2830 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6400 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N2830 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6400 scores 1,175 against the Celeron N2830's 1,185 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron N2830. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6400	Celeron N2830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz	2.41 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.16 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Conroe (2006−2007)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,175	1,185

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E6400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N2830 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6400 versus 1333 on the Celeron N2830 — the Celeron N2830 supports 22.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6400 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6400) vs 4 (Celeron N2830) — the Core 2 Duo E6400 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6400) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2830).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6400	Celeron N2830
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	1066	1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	16+100%	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Celeron N2830 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E6400 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6400 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5400+; Celeron N2830 rivals AMD A6-6310.