
Core 2 Duo E6550

Core i3-2370M
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-2370M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-2370M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-2370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E6550
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($163 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($163 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-2370M.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2370M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-2370M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core 2 Duo E6550 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E6550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,370 vs 1,395).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6550.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E6550 better than Core i3-2370M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-2370M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E6550
The Core 2 Duo E6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-2370M
The Core i3-2370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E6550 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2370M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6550 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-2370M — a 3% clock advantage for the Core i3-2370M (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6550 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-2370M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6550 scores 1,395 against the Core i3-2370M's 1,370 — a 1.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6550. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6550 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2370M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,395+2% | 1,370 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 711 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6550 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6550) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2370M).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6550) vs VT-x (Core i3-2370M). The Core i3-2370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2370M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6550 rivals Athlon 64 X2 6000+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E6550 was priced at $163, while the Core i3-2370M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($163 vs $225), Core 2 Duo E6550 was $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6550 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-2370M — making the Core 2 Duo E6550 the 33.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $163-28% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+41% | 6.1 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














