
Core 2 Duo E6550

Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E6550
2007Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium Dual Core SU4100.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,395 vs 1,409).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($163 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
2009Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6550.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium Dual Core SU4100 better than Core 2 Duo E6550?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E6550
The Core 2 Duo E6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100
The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E6550 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6550 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — a 56.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6550. The Core 2 Duo E6550 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6550 scores 1,395 against the Pentium Dual Core SU4100's 1,409 — a 1% lead for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.33 GHz+79% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.33 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,395 | 1,409+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6550 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core 2 Duo E6550) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core SU4100). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6550 rivals Athlon 64 X2 6000+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E6550 was priced at $163, while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($163 vs $134), Pentium Dual Core SU4100 was $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6550 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — making the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 the 20.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6550 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $163 | $134-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 10.5+22% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














