Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i5-2467M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i5-2467M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i5-2467M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E6550

2007

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-2467M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,395 vs 1,410).
❌Launch MSRP is still $163 MSRP, while Core i5-2467M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2467M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-2467M

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core 2 Duo E6550 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6550.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2467M better than Core 2 Duo E6550?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E6550 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2467M pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2467M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2467M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-2467M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $163 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo E6550 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2467M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i5-2467M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E6550

The Core 2 Duo E6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E6550 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2467M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6550 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M — a 1.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6550 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6550 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2467M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6550 scores 1,395 against the Core i5-2467M's 1,410 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-2467M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6550 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6550	Core i5-2467M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.33 GHz+1%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.33 GHz+46%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Conroe (2006−2007)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,395	1,410+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E6550 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2467M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6550) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6550	Core i5-2467M
Socket	LGA775	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16	16
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-2467M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6550 rivals Athlon 64 X2 6000+; Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.