Core 2 Duo E7400 vs E-350

Core 2 Duo E7400 vs E-350 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E7400

2 / 2

1,043

0.0%

1,049

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E7400 vs E-350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E7400 vs E-350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E7400

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike E-350.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,043 vs 1,049).
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.

E-350

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo E7400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E7400.

Quick Answers

So, is E-350 better than Core 2 Duo E7400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E7400 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E-350 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E-350 is the better buy right now. E-350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E7400 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E7400 vs E-350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E7400

The Core 2 Duo E7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,043 points. Launch price was $249.

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E7400 and E-350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7400 versus 1.6 GHz on the E-350 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7400. The Core 2 Duo E7400 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the E-350 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7400 scores 1,043 against the E-350's 1,049 — a 0.6% lead for the E-350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7400	E-350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+75%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	3 MB (total)	512K (per core)+16967%
Process	45 nm	40 nm-11%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,043	1,049

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E7400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E-350 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.