A6-9220C
VS
Core 2 Duo E7400

A6-9220C vs Core 2 Duo E7400

AMD

A6-9220C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E7400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9220C is positioned at rank 931 and the Core 2 Duo E7400 is on rank 544, so the Core 2 Duo E7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9220C

#919
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1672%
#920
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1647%
#921
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1512%
#922
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1505%
#923
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1492%
#925
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1440%
#926
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1381%
#927
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1379%
#928
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1342%
#931
A6-9220C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8965%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8471%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6151%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1853%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1468%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1284%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
735%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
726%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
661%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
661%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
653%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
636%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
627%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
624%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
619%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
99%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
95%
#544
Core 2 Duo E7400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
100%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
98%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
98%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
98%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
97%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
97%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
97%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9220C (2019) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9220CCore 2 Duo E7400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E7400 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9220CCore 2 Duo E7400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9220C and Core 2 Duo E7400

AMD

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7400

The Core 2 Duo E7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,043 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220C and Core 2 Duo E7400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7400 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7400 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7400 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Core 2 Duo E7400's 1,043 — a 1% lead for the A6-9220C.

FeatureA6-9220CCore 2 Duo E7400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+200%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,053
1,043
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E7400 — the Core 2 Duo E7400 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E7400 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E7400). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E7400) — the Core 2 Duo E7400 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7400).

FeatureA6-9220CCore 2 Duo E7400
Socket
FT4
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
1066+26550%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220C) / true (Core 2 Duo E7400). The A6-9220C includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo E7400 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7400 rivals Athlon II X2 245.

FeatureA6-9220CCore 2 Duo E7400
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true