A6-9220C
Celeron T3500
A6-9220C vs Celeron T3500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-9220C vs Celeron T3500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-9220C vs Celeron T3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-9220C
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Celeron T3500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,053 vs 1,055).
Celeron T3500
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A6-9220C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron T3500 better than A6-9220C?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-9220C vs Celeron T3500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A6-9220C
The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron T3500
The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A6-9220C is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Celeron T3500's 1,055 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron T3500.
| Feature | A6-9220C | Celeron T3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | — | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 1,053 | 1,055 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron T3500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A6-9220C | Celeron T3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT4 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The A6-9220C includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Celeron T3500 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | A6-9220C | Celeron T3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R5 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-9220C and Celeron T3500
