A6-9220C
VS
Celeron G530T

A6-9220C vs Celeron G530T

AMD

A6-9220C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Celeron G530T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9220C is positioned at rank 931 and the Celeron G530T is on rank 769, so the Celeron G530T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9220C

#919
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1672%
#920
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1647%
#921
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1512%
#922
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1505%
#923
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1492%
#925
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1440%
#926
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1381%
#927
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1379%
#928
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1342%
#931
A6-9220C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G530T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14759%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13946%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10126%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3051%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2416%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2114%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1211%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1195%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1088%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1088%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1076%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1047%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1032%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1028%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1019%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
99%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
100%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
100%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
99%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#779
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
98%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9220C (2019) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9220CCeleron G530T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G530T (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9220CCeleron G530T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9220C and Celeron G530T

AMD

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron G530T

The Celeron G530T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220C and Celeron G530T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 2 GHz on the Celeron G530T — a 29.8% clock advantage for the A6-9220C (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G530T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Celeron G530T's 1,056 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G530T.

FeatureA6-9220CCeleron G530T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,053
1,056
Geekbench 6 Single
384
Geekbench 6 Multi
655
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G530T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G530T — the A6-9220C supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G530T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Celeron G530T). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 16 (Celeron G530T) — the Celeron G530T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and H61,H67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G530T).

FeatureA6-9220CCeleron G530T
Socket
FT4
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220C) / VT-x (Celeron G530T). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9220C) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G530T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G530T rivals Pentium G630T.

FeatureA6-9220CCeleron G530T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop