A6-9220C vs Athlon X2 BE-2400

A6-9220C vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220C

2 / 2

1,053

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2 / 2

1,050

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220C vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220C vs Athlon X2 BE-2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220C

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Athlon X2 BE-2400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,053).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A6-9220C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9220C better than Athlon X2 BE-2400?

Yes. A6-9220C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-9220C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-9220C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9220C is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-9220C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X2 BE-2400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9220C vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220C and Athlon X2 BE-2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — a 16% clock advantage for the A6-9220C. The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Athlon X2 BE-2400's 1,050 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-9220C.

Feature	A6-9220C	Athlon X2 BE-2400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,053	1,050

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — the A6-9220C supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) — the A6-9220C offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400).

Feature	A6-9220C	Athlon X2 BE-2400
Socket	FT4	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+133%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0