A6-9220C vs Atom Z2560

A6-9220C vs Atom Z2560 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220C

2 / 2

1,053

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z2560

2 / 4

1,056

+0.3%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220C vs Atom Z2560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220C vs Atom Z2560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220C

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,053 vs 1,056).
❌100% higher power demand at 6W vs 3W.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 6W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z2560 better than A6-9220C?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9220C is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z2560 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9220C vs Atom Z2560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-9220C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom Z2560's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 — a 51.2% clock advantage for the A6-9220C. The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom Z2560 uses Clovertrail (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Atom Z2560's 1,056 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom Z2560.

Feature	A6-9220C	Atom Z2560
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+69%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Clovertrail (2013)
PassMark	1,053	1,056

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom Z2560 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus LPDDR2-1066 on the Atom Z2560 — the A6-9220C supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9220C supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Atom Z2560). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 0 (Atom Z2560) — the A6-9220C offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2560).

Feature	A6-9220C	Atom Z2560
Socket	FT4	FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+75%	LPDDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9220C) and PowerVR SGX544MP2 (Atom Z2560) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.