A6-9220C vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700

A6-9220C vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220C

2 / 2

1,053

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

2 / 2

1,058

+0.5%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220C vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220C vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220C

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Celeron Dual-Core T1700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,053 vs 1,058).
❌500% higher power demand at 6W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 6W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1700 better than A6-9220C?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9220C is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1700 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron Dual-Core T1700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9220C vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220C and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 1.83 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 — a 38.4% clock advantage for the A6-9220C. The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1700's 1,058 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1700.

Feature	A6-9220C	Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+48%	1.83 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,053	1,058

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 — the A6-9220C supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9220C supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T1700). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1700) — the A6-9220C offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron Dual-Core T1700).

Feature	A6-9220C	Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Socket	FT4	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+180%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220C) / No (Celeron Dual-Core T1700). The A6-9220C includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1700 rivals Pentium T2390.