
Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Core i5-2537M

Core 2 Duo E7600

Core i5-2537M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7600 is positioned at rank 1019 and the Core i5-2537M is on rank 1217, so the Core 2 Duo E7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7600
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2537M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7600 | Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7600 | Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+403%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7600 and Core i5-2537M

Core 2 Duo E7600
The Core 2 Duo E7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,150 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i5-2537M
The Core i5-2537M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E7600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2537M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7600 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2537M — a 188.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-2537M (base: 3.06 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7600 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2537M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7600 scores 1,150 against the Core i5-2537M's 1,144 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 422 vs 427, a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-2537M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 690 vs 717 (3.8% advantage for the Core i5-2537M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7600 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2537M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7600 | Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 2.3 GHz+3186% |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz+119% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (total)+1100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,150 | 1,144 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 422 | 427+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 690 | 717+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E7600 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2537M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo E7600 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2537M — the Core i5-2537M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P45,P43,G45,G43,P35,G33 (Core 2 Duo E7600) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2537M).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7600 | Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 1333+44333% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+104857500% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7600) vs true (Core i5-2537M). The Core i5-2537M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo E7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7600 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7600 rivals Athlon II X2 250; Core i5-2537M rivals Core i5-2410M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7600 | Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E7600 launched at $133 MSRP, while the Core i5-2537M debuted at $250.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7600 | Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $133-47% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















