
Core 2 Duo E8200

Pentium G640T
Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Pentium G640T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Pentium G640T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Pentium G640T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E8200
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium G640T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($163 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Pentium G640T
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,139 vs 1,144).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E8200.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E8200 better than Pentium G640T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Pentium G640T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8200
The Core 2 Duo E8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium G640T
The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E8200 and Pentium G640T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8200 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 10.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8200 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8200 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G640T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8200 scores 1,144 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E8200 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8200 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz+11% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+11% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+2300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,144 | 1,139 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G640T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8200 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E8200) / not specified (Pentium G640T). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E8200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E8200 rivals Phenom II X2 550.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8200 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8200 was priced at $163, while the Pentium G640T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($163 vs $64), Pentium G640T was $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8200 delivers 7.0 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G640T — making the Pentium G640T the 86.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8200 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $163 | $64-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 17.8+154% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














