Core 2 Duo E8400
VS
Core 2 Duo E6400

Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Core 2 Duo E6400

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8400 is positioned at rank 508 and the Core 2 Duo E6400 is on rank 1059, so the Core 2 Duo E8400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8028%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7585%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5508%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1659%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1150%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
659%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
650%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
592%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
592%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
585%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
569%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
561%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
559%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
554%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
99%
#508
Core 2 Duo E8400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
99%
#518
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#519
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
98%
#520
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
98%
#522
Athlon II X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
48554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
45879%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
33312%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10035%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7949%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6954%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3983%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3931%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3579%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3579%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3539%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3443%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3395%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3381%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3351%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
100%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
99%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
99%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
94%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
92%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
91%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
90%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
89%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
88%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
88%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
84%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
78%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
77%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E8400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo E6400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E6400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E6400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8400 and Core 2 Duo E6400

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8400

The Core 2 Duo E8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,165 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6400

The Core 2 Duo E6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8400 and Core 2 Duo E6400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8400 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6400 — a 33.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8400 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8400 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6400 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8400 scores 1,165 against the Core 2 Duo E6400's 1,175 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E6400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+41%
2.13 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+41%
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,165
1,175
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8400 versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6400 — the Core 2 Duo E8400 supports 22.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E8400) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6400).

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E6400
Socket
LGA775
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333+25%
1066
Max RAM Capacity
16
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E8400 rivals Phenom II X2 550; Core 2 Duo E6400 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5400+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E6400
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true