Core 2 Duo E8600
VS
A8-3500M

Core 2 Duo E8600 vs A8-3500M

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A8-3500M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8600 is positioned at rank 1050 and the A8-3500M is on rank 821, so the A8-3500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
45242%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
42749%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
31039%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9351%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7407%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6480%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3711%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3663%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3335%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3335%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3297%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3208%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3164%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3151%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3122%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
100%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
99%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
99%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
99%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
98%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
96%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
95%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
94%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
93%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
92%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
88%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
88%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
85%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3500M

#809
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1266%
#810
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1247%
#811
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1145%
#812
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1140%
#813
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1129%
#815
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1091%
#816
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1046%
#817
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1044%
#818
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1016%
#821
A8-3500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
97%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
96%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
96%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E8600 leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-3500M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8600A8-3500M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo E8600A8-3500M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8600 and A8-3500M

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8600

The Core 2 Duo E8600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,378 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A8-3500M

The A8-3500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,391 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E8600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-3500M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3500M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8600 versus 2.4 GHz on the A8-3500M — a 32.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8600 (base: 3.33 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8600 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A8-3500M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8600 scores 1,378 against the A8-3500M's 1,391 — a 0.9% lead for the A8-3500M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 486 vs 231, a 71.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8600A8-3500M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz+39%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.33 GHz+122%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+500%
1 MB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,378
1,391
Geekbench 6 Single
486+110%
231
Geekbench 6 Multi
885
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8600 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A8-3500M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E8600) vs 20 (A8-3500M) — the A8-3500M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8600A8-3500M
Socket
LGA775
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E8600) vs AMD-V (A8-3500M). The A8-3500M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E8600 targets Legacy Desktop, A8-3500M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E8600 rivals Phenom II X2 550; A8-3500M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8600A8-3500M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon HD 6620G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Budget Laptop