Core 2 Duo L7400 vs Athlon 64 FX-57
Core 2 Duo L7400
Athlon 64 FX-57
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo L7400 is positioned at rank 434 and the Athlon 64 FX-57 is on rank 1137, so the Core 2 Duo L7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo L7400
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-57
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo L7400 | Athlon 64 FX-57 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo L7400 | Athlon 64 FX-57 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo L7400 and Athlon 64 FX-57
Core 2 Duo L7400
The Core 2 Duo L7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $249.
Athlon 64 FX-57
The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo L7400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon 64 FX-57 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo L7400 has 1 more core. The Athlon 64 FX-57 is built on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo L7400 scores 765 against the Athlon 64 FX-57's 720 — a 6.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo L7400. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7400 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-57.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo L7400 | Athlon 64 FX-57 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm-28% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | — | San Diego (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 765+6% | 720 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo L7400 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 FX-57 uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo L7400 | Athlon 64 FX-57 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA479 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo L7400 and Athlon 64 FX-57
