Core 2 Duo L7400 vs E1-2200

Intel

Core 2 Duo L7400

2 Cores17 WW2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

E1-2200

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1.05 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo L7400 vs E1-2200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo L7400 vs E1-2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo L7400 vs E1-2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo L7400

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E1-2200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (765 vs 802).
    • 88.9% higher power demand at 17W vs 9W.

    E1-2200

    2013

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Draws 9W instead of 17W, a 8W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is E1-2200 better than Core 2 Duo L7400?
    Yes. E1-2200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, E1-2200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-2200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    E1-2200 still makes the most sense overall. E1-2200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    E1-2200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/0. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core 2 Duo L7400 vs E1-2200 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core 2 Duo L7400

    The Core 2 Duo L7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $249.

    AMD

    E1-2200

    The E1-2200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.05 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 802 points. Launch price was $50.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core 2 Duo L7400 and E1-2200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The E1-2200 is built on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo L7400 scores 765 against the E1-2200's 802 — a 4.7% lead for the E1-2200.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo L7400E1-2200
    Cores / Threads
    2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.05 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB L2 Cache
    L2 Cache
    1024 kB
    Process
    65 nm
    28 nm-57%
    Architecture
    Kabini (2013−2014)
    PassMark
    765
    802+5%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 2 Duo L7400 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-2200 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo L7400E1-2200
    Socket
    BGA479
    FT3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%