
Core 2 Duo P8700

Athlon PRO 3045B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo P8700 is positioned at rank 140 and the Athlon PRO 3045B is on rank 1177, so the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Per Dollar Athlon PRO 3045B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($85) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Dali (2020−2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+114%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($85) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon PRO 3045B

Core 2 Duo P8700
The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.

Athlon PRO 3045B
The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo P8700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon PRO 3045B's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Athlon PRO 3045B (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8700 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon PRO 3045B uses Dali (2020−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8700 scores 2,805 against the Athlon PRO 3045B's 2,770 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8700. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 3045B.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.53 GHz | 3.2 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.53 GHz+10% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Dali (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 2,805+1% | 2,770 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo P8700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon PRO 3045B uses FP5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 3045B — the Core 2 Duo P8700 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon PRO 3045B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) vs 8 (Athlon PRO 3045B) — the Athlon PRO 3045B offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8700) and AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 3045B).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+26550% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | 32 GB+419430300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core 2 Duo P8700) / not specified (Athlon PRO 3045B). The Athlon PRO 3045B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo P8700 launched at $241 MSRP, while the Athlon PRO 3045B debuted at $426. At current prices ($85 vs $180), the Core 2 Duo P8700 is $95 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo P8700 delivers 33.0 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Athlon PRO 3045B — making the Core 2 Duo P8700 the 72.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $241-43% | $426 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85-53% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0+114% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















