
Core 2 Duo P8700

Celeron G6900TE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Duo P8700 is positioned at rank #140 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900TE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) | ✅ More affordable ($64) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+32%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) | ✅ More affordable ($64) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P8700 and Celeron G6900TE

Core 2 Duo P8700
The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.

Celeron G6900TE
The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo P8700 and Celeron G6900TE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8700 (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8700 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G6900TE uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8700 scores 2,805 against the Celeron G6900TE's 2,782 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8700. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.53 GHz+5% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.53 GHz+5% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 10 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,805 | 2,782 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,457 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo P8700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G6900TE uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE — the Core 2 Duo P8700 supports 198.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) vs 20 (Celeron G6900TE) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8700) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 5.0+355% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+21220% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | 128 GB+1677721500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo P8700) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900TE). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600; Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo P8700 launched at $241 MSRP, while the Celeron G6900TE debuted at $53. At current prices ($85 vs $64), the Celeron G6900TE is $21 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo P8700 delivers 33.0 pts/$ vs 43.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900TE — making the Celeron G6900TE the 27.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8700 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $241 | $53-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85 | $64-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0 | 43.5+32% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















