Core 2 Duo P8700
VS
Core i5-4200M

Core 2 Duo P8700 vs Core i5-4200M

Intel

Core 2 Duo P8700

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i5-4200M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo P8700 is positioned at rank 140 and the Core i5-4200M is on rank 1025, so the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8700

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
99%
#128
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
314%
#129
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
309%
#130
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
284%
#131
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
283%
#132
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
280%
#134
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
270%
#135
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
259%
#136
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
259%
#137
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
252%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
100%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200M

#1013
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2351%
#1014
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2317%
#1015
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2127%
#1016
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2117%
#1017
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2098%
#1019
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2026%
#1020
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1942%
#1021
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1939%
#1022
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1887%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
95%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4200M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo P8700 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo P8700Core i5-4200M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($85)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Duo P8700 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $85 (vs $225), it costs 62% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 164% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-4200M.
InsightCore 2 Duo P8700Core i5-4200M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+164%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($85)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core i5-4200M

Intel

Core 2 Duo P8700

The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.

Intel

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P8700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8700 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4200M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8700 scores 2,805 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4200M. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8700Core i5-4200M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
3.1 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+1%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB L2 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,805
2,809
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P8700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200M — the Core 2 Duo P8700 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4200M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) vs 16 (Core i5-4200M) — the Core i5-4200M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8700Core i5-4200M
Socket
PGA478
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8
32 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo P8700) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8700Core i5-4200M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo P8700 launched at $241 MSRP, while the Core i5-4200M debuted at $225.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8700Core i5-4200M
MSRP
$241
$225-7%
Avg Price (30d)
$85
Release Date
2009
2013