Core 2 Duo SL9400
VS
A8-7200P

Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs A8-7200P

Intel

Core 2 Duo SL9400

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A8-7200P

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is positioned at rank 1147 and the A8-7200P is on rank 617, so the A8-7200P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SL9400

#1135
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3886%
#1136
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3829%
#1137
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3515%
#1138
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3499%
#1139
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3467%
#1141
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3348%
#1142
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3211%
#1143
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3205%
#1144
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3119%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
100%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
95%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
94%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7200P

#605
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
816%
#606
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
804%
#607
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
738%
#608
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
735%
#609
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
728%
#611
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
703%
#612
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
674%
#613
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
673%
#614
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
655%
#617
A8-7200P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A8-7200P (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo SL9400A8-7200P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($284)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo SL9400A8-7200P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($284)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SL9400 and A8-7200P

Intel

Core 2 Duo SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $284.

AMD

A8-7200P

The A8-7200P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-7200P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7200P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 versus 3.3 GHz on the A8-7200P — a 55.8% clock advantage for the A8-7200P (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A8-7200P uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9400 scores 2,144 against the A8-7200P's 2,158 — a 0.7% lead for the A8-7200P.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9400A8-7200P
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
3.3 GHz+77%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2.4 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4096 kB
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
2,144
2,158
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A8-7200P uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 versus 1866 on the A8-7200P — the A8-7200P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7200P supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GS45,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo SL9400) and FP3 (A8-7200P).

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9400A8-7200P
Socket
BGA956
FP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SL9400) vs true (A8-7200P). The A8-7200P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo SL9400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9400 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-7200P rivals Core i3-4100M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9400A8-7200P
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Mobile