Core 2 Duo SL9400
VS
Xeon L5420

Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Xeon L5420

Intel

Core 2 Duo SL9400

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Xeon L5420

4 Cores4 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is positioned at rank 1147 and the Xeon L5420 is on rank 847, so the Xeon L5420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SL9400

#1135
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3886%
#1136
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3829%
#1137
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3515%
#1138
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3499%
#1139
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3467%
#1141
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3348%
#1142
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3211%
#1143
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3205%
#1144
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3119%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
100%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
95%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
94%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5420

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19386%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3660%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3252%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2512%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
100%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
100%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
99%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
99%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
98%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
97%
#847
Xeon L5420
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
99%
#857
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5420 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore 2 Duo SL9400Xeon L5420
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($284)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 ($284), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($284 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore 2 Duo SL9400Xeon L5420
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($284)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon L5420

Intel

Core 2 Duo SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $284.

Intel

Xeon L5420

The Xeon L5420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 March 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,143 points. Launch price was $380.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L5420 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5420 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon L5420 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Xeon L5420 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon L5420 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9400 scores 2,144 against the Xeon L5420's 2,143 — a 0% lead for the Core 2 Duo SL9400. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5420.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9400Xeon L5420
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
2.5 GHz+34%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2.5 GHz+34%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
6 MB
6 MB (total)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,144
2,143
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon L5420 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9400Xeon L5420
Socket
BGA956
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SL9400) / not specified (Xeon L5420). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9400 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9400Xeon L5420
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile