Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Turion II Ultra M600

Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Turion II Ultra M600 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo SL9400

2 / 2

2,144

+1.1%

2,120

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Turion II Ultra M600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Turion II Ultra M600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SL9400

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $284 MSRP, while Turion II Ultra M600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.

Turion II Ultra M600

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,120 vs 2,144).

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Ultra M600 better than Core 2 Duo SL9400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II Ultra M600 is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SL9400 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SL9400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Ultra M600 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion II Ultra M600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $284 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo SL9400 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Ultra M600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Turion II Ultra M600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $284.

Turion II Ultra M600

The Turion II Ultra M600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,120 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Turion II Ultra M600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M600 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Turion II Ultra M600. The Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M600 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9400 scores 2,144 against the Turion II Ultra M600's 2,120 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SL9400.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SL9400	Turion II Ultra M600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.4 GHz+29%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	2,144+1%	2,120

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Ultra M600 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.