Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Pentium P6000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Pentium P6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Pentium P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SL9600

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Pentium P6000

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,054).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo SL9600 better than Pentium P6000?

Yes. Core 2 Duo SL9600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo SL9600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SL9600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo SL9600 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core 2 Duo SL9600 comes in 110.7% more expensive on MSRP at $316 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6000 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 110.4% better value on paper (13.7 vs 6.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium P6000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Pentium P6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SL9600

The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $316.

Pentium P6000

The Pentium P6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.88 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Pentium P6000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 versus 1.88 GHz on the Pentium P6000 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SL9600 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium P6000 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9600 scores 2,054 against the Pentium P6000's 2,051 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SL9600. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6000.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SL9600	Pentium P6000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz+13%	1.88 GHz
Base Clock	2.13 GHz+15%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache+100%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6 MB	256K (per core)+4167%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,054	2,051

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium P6000 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SL9600	Pentium P6000
Socket	BGA956	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo SL9600) / not specified (Pentium P6000). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9600 targets Mobile.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SL9600	Pentium P6000
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo SL9600 was priced at $316, while the Pentium P6000 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($316 vs $150), Pentium P6000 was $166 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SL9600 delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Pentium P6000 — making the Pentium P6000 the 71.1% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SL9600	Pentium P6000
MSRP	$316	$150-53%
Performance per Dollar	6.5	13.7+111%
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Core 2 Duo SL9600 on Amazon

Search Pentium P6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.