Core 2 Duo SL9600
VS
Phenom II X4 830

Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Phenom II X4 830

Intel

Core 2 Duo SL9600

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 830

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is positioned at rank 1177 and the Phenom II X4 830 is on rank 307, so the Phenom II X4 830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SL9600

#1165
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4514%
#1166
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4448%
#1167
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4083%
#1168
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4065%
#1169
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4027%
#1171
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3889%
#1172
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3729%
#1173
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3723%
#1174
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3623%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
100%
#1178
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
100%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
100%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
99%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
96%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
95%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
93%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
93%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
92%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 830

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4513%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4264%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3096%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
933%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
646%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
370%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
365%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
333%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
333%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
320%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
316%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
314%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
311%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
100%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
100%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
99%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
99%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
97%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
97%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
96%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
96%
#307
Phenom II X4 830
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#312
Phenom II X4 810
MSRP: $175|Avg: N/A
98%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Phenom II X4 830 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo SL9600 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo SL9600Phenom II X4 830
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($316)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo SL9600Phenom II X4 830
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($316)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Phenom II X4 830

Intel

Core 2 Duo SL9600

The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $316.

AMD

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SL9600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 830 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 830 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9600 scores 2,054 against the Phenom II X4 830's 2,072 — a 0.9% lead for the Phenom II X4 830. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 830.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9600Phenom II X4 830
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.13 GHz
2.8 GHz+31%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
2.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+1100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,054
2,072
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9600Phenom II X4 830
Socket
BGA956
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo SL9600) / not specified (Phenom II X4 830). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9600 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SL9600Phenom II X4 830
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile