
Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Xeon X5355

Core 2 Duo SL9600

Xeon X5355
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is positioned at rank 1177 and the Xeon X5355 is on rank 1032, so the Xeon X5355 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SL9600
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5355
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($316) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1175%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($316) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Xeon X5355

Core 2 Duo SL9600
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $316.

Xeon X5355
The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5355 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 — a 104.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SL9600 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5355 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9600 scores 2,054 against the Xeon X5355's 2,039 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo SL9600. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.13 GHz+218% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.13 GHz | 2.66 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 2,054 | 2,039 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon X5355 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo SL9600) / not specified (Xeon X5355). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9600 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Xeon X5355 debuted at $4491.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316-93% | $4491 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $4000 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















