
Core 2 Duo SL9600

Xeon X5355
Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Xeon X5355 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Xeon X5355 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Xeon X5355: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo SL9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,175 less on MSRP ($316 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1331.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0.5 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 120W, a 114W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5355, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
Xeon X5355
2006Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,039 vs 2,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 120W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo SL9600 better than Xeon X5355?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Xeon X5355 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SL9600
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $316.

Xeon X5355
The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5355 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 — a 104.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SL9600 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5355 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SL9600 scores 2,054 against the Xeon X5355's 2,039 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo SL9600. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.13 GHz+218% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.13 GHz | 2.66 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 2,054 | 2,039 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon X5355 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo SL9600) / not specified (Xeon X5355). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9600 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo SL9600 was priced at $316, while the Xeon X5355 came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($316 vs $4491), Core 2 Duo SL9600 was $4175 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SL9600 delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 0.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5355 — making the Core 2 Duo SL9600 the 173.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SL9600 | Xeon X5355 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316-93% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5+1200% | 0.5 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2006 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














