Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Pentium M 725

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU9300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 725

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Pentium M 725 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Pentium M 725 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Pentium M 725: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU9300

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 3W instead of 21W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,392 vs 1,400).

Pentium M 725

2004

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 600% higher power demand at 21W vs 3W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium M 725 better than Core 2 Duo SU9300?
    Yes. Pentium M 725 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 725 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 725 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium M 725 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 725 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core 2 Duo SU9300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Pentium M 725 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core 2 Duo SU9300

    The Core 2 Duo SU9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,392 points. Launch price was $249.

    Intel

    Pentium M 725

    The Pentium M 725 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,400 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core 2 Duo SU9300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 725 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo SU9300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU9300 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 725 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium M 725 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU9300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium M 725 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU9300 scores 1,392 against the Pentium M 725's 1,400 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium M 725. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 725.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo SU9300Pentium M 725
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.2 GHz
    1.6 GHz+33%
    Base Clock
    1.2 GHz
    1.6 GHz+33%
    L3 Cache
    3 MB L2 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    3 MB+50%
    2 MB
    Process
    45 nm-50%
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Penryn (2008−2011)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    1,392
    1,400
    Geekbench 6 Single
    150
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    150
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 2 Duo SU9300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 725 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo SU9300Pentium M 725
    Socket
    BGA956
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-333
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo SU9300) / None (Pentium M 725). Primary use case: Pentium M 725 targets Legacy Laptop.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo SU9300Pentium M 725
    Integrated GPU
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    None
    Target Use
    Legacy Laptop