Celeron 1020E vs Core 2 Duo SU9300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1020E vs Core 2 Duo SU9300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1020E vs Core 2 Duo SU9300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1020E

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo SU9300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo SU9300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo SU9300

2008

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,392 vs 1,406).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1020E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1020E better than Core 2 Duo SU9300?

Yes. Celeron 1020E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1020E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1020E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1020E is the better buy right now. Celeron 1020E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1020E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1020E vs Core 2 Duo SU9300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1020E

The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo SU9300

The Core 2 Duo SU9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,392 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1020E and Core 2 Duo SU9300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU9300 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 1020E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron 1020E uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU9300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Core 2 Duo SU9300's 1,392 — a 1% lead for the Celeron 1020E. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1020E vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU9300.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Core 2 Duo SU9300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+83%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+83%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+8433%	3 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,406+1%	1,392

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU9300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Core 2 Duo SU9300
Socket	G2	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) / not specified (Core 2 Duo SU9300). The Celeron 1020E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo SU9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.