Celeron 1020E
VS
Pentium 2020M

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium 2020M

Intel

Celeron 1020E

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium 2020M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1020E is positioned at rank 951 and the Pentium 2020M is on rank 1063, so the Celeron 1020E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1020E

#939
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1794%
#940
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1768%
#941
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1623%
#942
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1616%
#943
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1601%
#945
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1546%
#946
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1483%
#947
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1480%
#948
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1440%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
99%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 2020M

#1051
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2784%
#1052
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2743%
#1053
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2518%
#1054
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2507%
#1055
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2484%
#1057
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2398%
#1058
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2300%
#1059
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2296%
#1060
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2234%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
100%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
99%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
99%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
97%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
97%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium 2020M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 1020E in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 1020EPentium 2020M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron 1020E holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $20 (vs $134), it costs 85% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 567% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium 2020M.
InsightCeleron 1020EPentium 2020M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+567%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1020E and Pentium 2020M

Intel

Celeron 1020E

The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 2020M

The Pentium 2020M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1020E and Pentium 2020M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 2020M — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Pentium 2020M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Pentium 2020M's 1,412 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium 2020M. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium 2020M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,406
1,412
Geekbench 6 Single
391
Geekbench 6 Multi
667
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 2020M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Pentium 2020M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM77,HM76 (Celeron 1020E) and HM70,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Pentium 2020M).

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium 2020M
Socket
G2
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) vs VT-x / EPT (Pentium 2020M). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1020E) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Pentium 2020M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget, Pentium 2020M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium 2020M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x / EPT
Target Use
Budget
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1020E launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium 2020M debuted at $134.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium 2020M
MSRP
$86-36%
$134
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Release Date
2013
2012