
Celeron 1020E

Pentium D 820
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium D 820 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium D 820 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium D 820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1020E
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 179.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 5.9 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium D 820 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,406 vs 1,412).
- ❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
Pentium D 820
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1020E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium D 820 better than Celeron 1020E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium D 820 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1020E
The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium D 820
The Pentium D 820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 1020E and Pentium D 820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 820 — a 24% clock advantage for the Pentium D 820 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 1020E uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium D 820 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Pentium D 820's 1,412 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium D 820. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1020E vs 0 kB on the Pentium D 820.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB |
| Process | 22 nm-76% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,406 | 1,412 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 166 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium D 820 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1020E versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 820 — the Celeron 1020E supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1020E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1020E) vs 0 (Pentium D 820) — the Celeron 1020E offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM77,HM76 (Celeron 1020E) and Intel 945,Intel 955 (Pentium D 820).
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G2 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+140% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) vs No (Pentium D 820). The Celeron 1020E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium D 820 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | No |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1020E was priced at $86, while the Pentium D 820 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($86 vs $241), Celeron 1020E was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1020E delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 5.9 pts/$ for the Pentium D 820 — making the Celeron 1020E the 94.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-64% | $241 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+176% | 5.9 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2005 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














