
Celeron 1020E

Pentium E5300
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium E5300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium E5300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium E5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1020E
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium E5300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Pentium E5300
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,395 vs 1,406).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1020E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium E5300 better than Celeron 1020E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1020E vs Pentium E5300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1020E
The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5300
The Pentium E5300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $64.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 1020E and Pentium E5300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium E5300 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E5300 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron 1020E uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E5300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Pentium E5300's 1,395 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 1020E. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1020E vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium E5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,406 | 1,395 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium E5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G2 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) / not specified (Pentium E5300). The Celeron 1020E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium E5300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium E5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1020E was priced at $86, while the Pentium E5300 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($86 vs $62), Pentium E5300 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1020E delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 22.5 pts/$ for the Pentium E5300 — making the Pentium E5300 the 31.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1020E | Pentium E5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $62-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 22.5+38% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














