Celeron 1020E
VS
Pentium E5300

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium E5300

Intel

Celeron 1020E

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium E5300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1020E is positioned at rank 951 and the Pentium E5300 is on rank 737, so the Pentium E5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1020E

#939
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1794%
#940
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1768%
#941
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1623%
#942
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1616%
#943
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1601%
#945
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1546%
#946
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1483%
#947
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1480%
#948
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1440%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
99%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13854%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13091%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9505%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2863%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2268%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1984%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1136%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1122%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1021%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1021%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1010%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
982%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
969%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
965%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
956%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
99%
#737
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
100%
#738
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
100%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
100%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
99%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
99%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
99%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
98%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
98%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
98%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
98%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium E5300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1020E is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1020EPentium E5300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron 1020E stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 20% cheaper ($20 vs $25) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 1020EPentium E5300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+26%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1020E and Pentium E5300

Intel

Celeron 1020E

The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium E5300

The Pentium E5300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1020E and Pentium E5300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium E5300 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E5300 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron 1020E uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E5300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Pentium E5300's 1,395 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 1020E. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1020E vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5300.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium E5300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,406
1,395
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium E5300
Socket
G2
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) / not specified (Pentium E5300). The Celeron 1020E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium E5300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium E5300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1020E launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium E5300 debuted at $62. At current prices ($20 vs $25), the Celeron 1020E is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1020E delivers 70.3 pts/$ vs 55.8 pts/$ for the Pentium E5300 — making the Celeron 1020E the 23% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 1020EPentium E5300
MSRP
$86
$62-28%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-20%
$25
Performance per Dollar
70.3+26%
55.8
Release Date
2013
2008