Celeron 1020E vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1020E

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium Dual Core SU4100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,406 vs 1,409).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1020E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1020E better than Pentium Dual Core SU4100?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 1020E is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1020E is the better buy right now. Celeron 1020E comes in $48 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 55.5% better value on MSRP (16.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1020E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1020E

The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1020E and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 1020E. The Celeron 1020E uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Pentium Dual Core SU4100's 1,409 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+69%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,406	1,409

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Socket	G2	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core SU4100). The Celeron 1020E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1020E was priced at $86, while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($86 vs $134), Celeron 1020E was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1020E delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — making the Celeron 1020E the 43.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP	$86-36%	$134
Performance per Dollar	16.3+55%	10.5
Release Date	2013	2009

Search Celeron 1020E on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core SU4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.