Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Pro A6-8500B

Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Pro A6-8500B Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo SU9400

2 / 2

1,596

+0.3%

1,592

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Pro A6-8500B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Pro A6-8500B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU9400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 3W vs 1W.

Pro A6-8500B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 3W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,592 vs 1,596).

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A6-8500B better than Core 2 Duo SU9400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A6-8500B is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU9400 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU9400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A6-8500B still makes the most sense overall. Pro A6-8500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A6-8500B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Pro A6-8500B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SU9400

The Core 2 Duo SU9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,596 points. Launch price was $262.

Pro A6-8500B

The Pro A6-8500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,592 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SU9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pro A6-8500B's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU9400 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A6-8500B — a 72.7% clock advantage for the Pro A6-8500B (base: 1.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A6-8500B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU9400 scores 1,596 against the Pro A6-8500B's 1,592 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU9400.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU9400	Pro A6-8500B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	3 GHz+114%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1024 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,596	1,592

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pro A6-8500B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.